William Case says a more democratic election has to be better than the alternative of no change
By William Case
South China Morning Post
Like others, I first greeted Beijing’s framework for Hong Kong’s universal suffrage with abhorrence. And I applauded the pan-democrats for refusing even to consider it. No reform is better than bad reform. And this one seemed especially bad.
For example, the framework’s logic resembles a loathsome royalist ideology in Thailand, wherein subjects are required to “know their place, low and high”. Only then, after accepting a steep and intricate social hierarchy of sakdina, can ordinary Thais be trusted to vote. Under “Thai-style democracy”, they must reliably elect “good people”, those whose karma and merit please the monarchy and the military.
Similarly, under Beijing-style universal suffrage, ordinary Hongkongers must pragmatically avoid…
View original post 755 more words